California: Where Elections Don't Matter
[This is a guest article, posted with the author's permission. We strive to include opinions from a wide range of people. If you are an author who would like your work to be posted here, simply contact us. --Ben]
by Joseph A. Palermo, Associate Professor of American History at California State University, Sacramento
Last November, Californians did not elect Republican Meg "Money Bags" Whitman to be their governor. We elected a Democratic governor and Democratic majorities in the State Assembly and the Senate. Yet five members of the Republican minority once again are in the driver's seat and they're determined to run the state right over the cliff. They've even hired Schwarzenegger's old budget director, Michael Genest, as a "consultant" while they block any attempt to address California's fiscal crisis and -- Wisconsin GOP-style -- they're even preventing Californians from voting on the matter.
The Republican minority, calling themselves the "GOP 5," are marching in lockstep with Wisconsin's governor Scott Walker: They're anti-democratic, authoritarian, and immature. They seem to relish imposing on the majority of Californians whatever their corporate paymasters want. They don't "negotiate," they behave like children. They demand everything and concede nothing. They use extortion, obstruction, and threats of tearing apart the social fabric in order to attain their maximum goals. They say they'll acquiesce in allowing the Plebeians to vote on measures to shore up the state's fiscal crisis (even after Governor Jerry Brown and the Democrats already put forth $12.5 billion in budget cuts), but only after they lay waste to any state government agency, program, or institution that does not expressly serve the interests of corporations (many of them out of state).
It all has a very 19th Century ring to it.
The press coverage of California's budget battle has been abysmal. The news media insist on facilitating the Republican narrative about what's going on in Sacramento without ever challenging it or even bothering to explain it.
There is a simple question that is lost inside the dominant (Republican-friendly) narrative:
Why is it legitimate for a minority of legislators to hold the state budget hostage while it attempts to extort its maximum long-term political goals from the majority?
The simple answer to that question is that it is not legitimate.
Now for the hypothetical question as it applies to California:
What if things were reversed and the state had a Republican governor and Republican majorities in the Assembly and Senate and a minority of legislators calling themselves the "Democrat 5" were holding the budget hostage while demanding increases in spending on schools, state parks, and better pensions for public employees?
What would be the narrative then?
No wonder the Republicans always over-reach. The game is rigged in their direction (even in California -- a state that didn't give George W. Bush one electoral vote).
The "GOP 5's" demands, as they currently stand, (and have frozen California in a state of fiscal distress) are nothing short of radical changes in state pension plans (which are the product of collective bargaining) and the gutting of business and environmental regulations that don't serve corporations, which have nothing to do whatsoever with next year's state budget or trying to get California out of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
The Five GOP Patriarchs (they're all white and male of course), won't even allow Californians to vote on a measure extending the emergency taxes that were already passed. It is on the same level of the authoritarian tactics of Scott Walker and the Wisconsin Republicans, but it's happening in California, a state far more crucial to any national economic recovery.
California's fiscal crisis, like that of all the other state governments, is a product of the Great Wall Street Toxic Waste Dump of 2008. After Wall Street's recklessness set off the financial hydrogen bomb, home values plummeted, life savings and retirements were erased, and jobs vanished, California's revenues drop by about $20 billion a year because lower valued homes shrink property taxes and unemployed people cannot pay income taxes. The state has been in a Groundhog Day of Reckoning ever since. Yet, as in Wisconsin, we're told that the crisis is somehow teachers and nurses and social workers and other public employees' fault.
Wiping out large swathes of the middle class, deflating the value of working people's homes, shredding their retirement plans, and extorting trillions in bailouts and loan guarantees from taxpayers wasn't enough. Now the captains of finance, along with their GOP servants, want to kill off the public sector so they can feast on the corpse.
Read more from Joseph A. Palermo at this link.


Comments
Pretty funny!
If we are going to resort to the same old cliche's about republicans (white men), can I jump in on that, and say this author sounds like a bitter old professor from the 60's who has been stuck in the classroom too long, and knows nothing of the real world. Now that we have that off our chests, let's talk about some issues the Professor has raised.
Professor Palermo says: "Why is it legitimate for a minority of legislators to hold the state budget hostage while it attempts to extort its maximum long-term political goals from the majority?"
If I am not mistaken, Proposition 25 passed in November, to change the budget process to a simple majority vote. However, the 2/3 majority vote is still needed to increase taxes. So maybe what the Professor meant to say was that these 5 republicans are holding a tax increase hostage, not the budget. This is not the first time I have heard this issue distorted. But then again, democrats think that a budget and tax increases are one in the same.
And again, if I am not mistaken, the people of California rejected the last attempt to increase taxes when put directly before the people. And it was largely rejected. Maybe the Professor has not gotten the hint that the people of California (which is mostly liberal) is telling the leaders of our state to live within their means, like the rest of us have to do. So this legislature and this Governor can pass their budget with a simple majority. Go for it. Forget the GOP 5, and get on with it. Do your thing, and put the tax extensions on the ballot in November with the needed signatures, and let's vote again.
I seems to me that there was a free election in November, and while the democrats one big, these 5 republicans hold office because they were voted in by the people they represent. Should they suddenly change their values, and become democrats?
Maybe we should just all become democrats. That way, I can buy boats and airplanes and not pay the taxes on them. I can also screw up on my taxes for years, and then must say "oops". I can have all kinds of off shore properties and bank accounts to hide my taxes as well. Maybe I can even become friends with the President, and get appointed to his economic counsel and then pay NO taxes at all (see GE).
What a wonderful world that would be.
But then again, I am not a professor of anything. So I am probably wrong.
Selective Memory?
I'm a little floored that so much in this piece is deliberately skewed and makes the Dems seem like innocent saints.
Here's a few passages I find a bit absurd:
"while they [GOP] block any attempt to address California's fiscal crisis and -- Wisconsin GOP-style -- they're even preventing Californians from voting on the matter."
-> Wasn't it the Wisconsin Dems that fled the State and blocked the process from moving forward? And although the GOP may be blocking a popular vote, when was the last time voters approved a tax hike/extension? We couldn't even pass a $15 fee to fund our State Parks, and we like our State Parks!
"The news media insist on facilitating the Republican narrative."
->Where's our liberal media when you need it? :-(
"No wonder the Republicans always over-reach. The game is rigged in their direction (even in California -- a state that didn't give George W. Bush one electoral vote)."
-> How is it 'rigged in their direction?' It's intentionally difficult to pass legislation. And on the electoral vote point, that's just ridiculous. There are only two states, Maine and Nebraska, that split electoral votes (sans faithless electors). It's always been a winner-take-all distribution in California, it's not that we voted 0% Bush. Shoot, from 1952 to 1992 California only gave electoral votes to a Dem once.
Did you forget about voter-passed and voter-protected Prop 13? That's placed an absolute stranglehold on the budget process for all government entities within the State.
What about our hyper-partisan, uncompetitive districts? Are we, the people, not responsible for our elected representatives?
I have difficulty accepting the arguments in this article because it seems to completely gloss over any missteps by the electorate or from Dems. Not everything that is broken in Sacramento is the GOP's fault.
RE
No doubt a very feisty piece from professor J. Palermo. Even though I think the GOP had an opportunity to explain that their vote for putting tax extensions on the ballot does not constitute an automatic tax increase, and they could have campaigned against it to prove it. I also don't think the professor has any comprehension on how militant the GOP base is about taxes. Unfortunately its a non-starter and would mean many of them who voted would end up without a political career.
Dems and Brown should have realized that sooner rather than later, but unfortunately there was a naive attempt to try and build partisan bridges with a party that has no desire or benefit from being a responsible trustee to the people, and not simply a mouthpiece delegate for their base.
I agree
I think the Republican legislators could have made the case for putting certain reforms on the ballot alongside the tax extensions, which would have helped blunt any potential criticism from their base. But it looks like ultimately they chose to play it safe and refuse to put the tax extensions on the ballot.
GOP Base?
The way everyone is talking about the GOP base in this state, you would think it was a Red state, controlled by the GOP. You talk as if it's just the GOP base that opposes tax increases. Does anyone remember the vote in 2009 on the tax extensions? Sure a recent poll indicated that the people want the right to vote on tax increases, but that does not translate to the fact that they would vote to increase them now. Let's stop putting this off on the GOP and wrap your heads around the fact that the people recently voted overwhelmingly NOT to extend those taxes another 5 years. It's not a GOP thing, it's a PEOPLE thing. We voted. Are we going to be putting this up for a vote every two years now? At what point do the democrats get the idea that they need to live within their means and start making some big time cuts. Maybe after a few years of that, the trust will come back and the people will vote for some tax increases. Until then, stop with the GOP Base bashing and get on with business. Pass the budget with the cuts that Brown has suggested, with a majority vote, and move on. Knock your selves out getting signatures to put it on the November ballot, and see what happens. But stop pretending that the GOP base is holding our state hostage. That's not reality.
Add new comment